Many industries are singing the praises of social networking forums like Facebook and Twitter, utilizing the sites as a tool for brand marketing and as an idea exchange platform; however evidence that it is a bane to others is becoming evident.
But while the benefit of reaching a wide audience in real time is a boon for many enterprises, the ability to instantaneously blast information to the masses can be injurious to parties on both “sides of the table” when it comes to auditions and casting sessions.
The Casting Society of America, while not condoning their member’s actions, took no formal action and left it to the Actors’ Equity Association to decide how to handle the offense. Initially, the casting director in question claimed “freedom of speech” (via Twitter, of course) in her defense, but after a meeting with AEA, released a statement of atonement. AEA then said to the media that they believed the matter to be closed.
Similarly, it appears that casting directors and their clients might be wary of unwanted information being posted via social networking tools as well.
One actor reported that, last week, a commercial casting house required those auditioning to sign a confidentiality agreement, stating that the actor would not share audition details in blogs or via Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Friendster, etc.
The identity of the casting company is not known and therefore could not be reached for comment: In keeping with the signed agreement, the actor declined to disclose the company’s name.
No comments:
Post a Comment